|
|
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Apr 26, 2021 15:14:54 GMT
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by rommel323 on Apr 27, 2021 7:27:36 GMT
I'd say ROC. Their troops were well trained and were the main force against Japanese, where as the CCP forces were guerilla fighters, because of which they suffered less causalities and eventually, winning China
|
|
|
|
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Apr 27, 2021 8:13:28 GMT
I'd say ROC. Their troops were well trained and were the main force against Japanese, where as the CCP forces were guerilla fighters, because of which they suffered less causalities and eventually, winning China Their troops were not well trained except those trained by Germans(Nazi ruled). |
|
|
|
Post by rommel323 on Apr 28, 2021 13:46:01 GMT
I'd say ROC. Their troops were well trained and were the main force against Japanese, where as the CCP forces were guerilla fighters, because of which they suffered less causalities and eventually, winning China Their troops were not well trained except those trained by Germans(Nazi ruled). I was talking about the trained troops. Though not many, they constituted a sizeable proportion of their army |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 28, 2021 13:53:12 GMT
America, duh. If there was literally no army in China, the Japanese would still have been stuck there. America destroyed their navy, Air Force, Islands, Cities. Britain really just defended Burma, even when they could have made an assault on Japanese-held territories.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Apr 28, 2021 14:03:51 GMT
Their troops were not well trained except those trained by Germans(Nazi ruled). I was talking about the trained troops. Though not many, they constituted a sizeable proportion of their army In 1942, only zero such armies were left. |
|
|
|
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Apr 28, 2021 14:04:46 GMT
America, duh. If there was literally no army in China, the Japanese would still have been stuck there. America destroyed their navy, Air Force, Islands, Cities. Britain really just defended Burma, even when they could have made an assault on Japanese-held territories. They recaptured Singapore. |
|
|
|
Post by Isaac Brock on Apr 28, 2021 15:17:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Apr 29, 2021 0:49:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Juan Carlos Bodoque on Apr 29, 2021 17:57:19 GMT
China/Ussr, Ussr helped end the war quickly, China (all factions) destroyed the japanese on land
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 29, 2021 19:46:19 GMT
China/Ussr, Ussr helped end the war quickly, China (all factions) destroyed the japanese on land America?! |
|
|
|
Post by Juan Carlos Bodoque on Apr 29, 2021 21:03:09 GMT
China/Ussr, Ussr helped end the war quickly, China (all factions) destroyed the japanese on land America?! America played a huge role but they pale in comparation to China who was fighting since 1936, maybe 1.China 2.America 3.Ussr 4.Brits/Dutch/French |
|
|
|
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Apr 30, 2021 1:29:02 GMT
America played a huge role but they pale in comparation to China who was fighting since 1936, maybe 1.China 2.America 3.Ussr 4.Brits/Dutch/French British at least recaptured parts of territory so they should be ranked higher than other 2. |
|
|
|
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Jun 10, 2021 15:36:55 GMT
America, duh. If there was literally no army in China, the Japanese would still have been stuck there. America destroyed their navy, Air Force, Islands, Cities. Britain really just defended Burma, even when they could have made an assault on Japanese-held territories. If there would have been literally no army in China, Pacific War wouldn't have started |
|
|
|
Post by rommel323 on Jun 14, 2021 4:26:40 GMT
America played a huge role but they pale in comparation to China who was fighting since 1936, maybe 1.China 2.America 3.Ussr 4.Brits/Dutch/French China and France took most brunt I feel |
|
