|
|
9/11
Jun 6, 2021 14:33:57 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 6, 2021 14:33:57 GMT
Major Conspiracy Alert: 9/11 wasn't done by terrorists. For one thing a building doesn't fall like that naturally. Also, look up building 7.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Jun 6, 2021 14:37:07 GMT
Major Conspiracy Alert: 9/11 wasn't done by terrorists. For one thing a building doesn't fall like that naturally. Also, look up building 7. This conspiracy is one of the best examples of lying on a matter without getting noticed because neither of the persons involved have knowledge about, making the lie look like truth. |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 9, 2021 16:12:43 GMT
Post by rommel323 on Jun 9, 2021 16:12:43 GMT
Major Conspiracy Alert: 9/11 wasn't done by terrorists. For one thing a building doesn't fall like that naturally. Also, look up building 7. So it was all a show? How do you claim? |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 9, 2021 22:36:01 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 9, 2021 22:36:01 GMT
Major Conspiracy Alert: 9/11 wasn't done by terrorists. For one thing a building doesn't fall like that naturally. Also, look up building 7. So it was all a show? How do you claim? I claim that it was an excuse to go to war in the middle east, because at the time, our dollar was based upon the value of oil. |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 10, 2021 2:08:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Jun 10, 2021 2:08:18 GMT
So it was all a show? How do you claim? I claim that it was an excuse to go to war in the middle east, because at the time, our dollar was based upon the value of oil. Due to 9/11, USA went to war in Afghanistan, not Iraq. |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 10, 2021 2:31:26 GMT
Post by rommel323 on Jun 10, 2021 2:31:26 GMT
So it was all a show? How do you claim? I claim that it was an excuse to go to war in the middle east, because at the time, our dollar was based upon the value of oil. Then why would they crash the planes into buildings? They could do a less complicated mission, like taking hostages |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 10, 2021 11:39:37 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 10, 2021 11:39:37 GMT
I claim that it was an excuse to go to war in the middle east, because at the time, our dollar was based upon the value of oil. Then why would they crash the planes into buildings? They could do a less complicated mission, like taking hostages That wouldn't create as much of an emotional appeal |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 10, 2021 11:40:28 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jun 10, 2021 11:40:28 GMT
I claim that it was an excuse to go to war in the middle east, because at the time, our dollar was based upon the value of oil. Due to 9/11, USA went to war in Afghanistan, not Iraq. It was the Middle East. As long as we are fighting terror, then we can invade wherever we want. |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 10, 2021 12:18:43 GMT
via mobile
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Jun 10, 2021 12:18:43 GMT
Due to 9/11, USA went to war in Afghanistan, not Iraq. It was the Middle East. As long as we are fighting terror, then we can invade wherever we want. But it is not convincing even now. |
|
|
|
Post by warlord247 on Jun 16, 2021 15:29:03 GMT
I belive that there is a good chance 9/11 was an inside job. For one thing, the U.S has a history of using such events to go to war (sinking of USS main to go to war with Spain, sinking of a destroyer (or cruiser, can't remember exactly) to go to war with the North Vietnamese, I'm sure there's more)
Another reason (as Gerdy provided) is that the towers did not fall naturally. Instead of the top of the tower falling to the side that the impact came from (similar as how a tree falls towards where it was chopped) it collapsed inwards, which is more similar to a controlled demolition.
After the buildings had collapsed, and the fire was put out, the government DID NOT allow anyone to do tests on the destroyed buildings, and quickly took away the destroyed materials. This is also suspicious behavior.
All in all, I think it was likely an inside job.
|
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 17, 2021 2:46:43 GMT
via mobile
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Jun 17, 2021 2:46:43 GMT
I belive that there is a good chance 9/11 was an inside job. For one thing, the U.S has a history of using such events to go to war (sinking of USS main to go to war with Spain, sinking of a destroyer (or cruiser, can't remember exactly) to go to war with the North Vietnamese, I'm sure there's more) Another reason (as Gerdy provided) is that the towers did not fall naturally. Instead of the top of the tower falling to the side that the impact came from (similar as how a tree falls towards where it was chopped) it collapsed inwards, which is more similar to a controlled demolition. After the buildings had collapsed, and the fire was put out, the government DID NOT allow anyone to do tests on the destroyed buildings, and quickly took away the destroyed materials. This is also suspicious behavior. All in all, I think it was likely an inside job. Another idiotic explanation |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 17, 2021 3:29:53 GMT
Post by warlord247 on Jun 17, 2021 3:29:53 GMT
I belive that there is a good chance 9/11 was an inside job. For one thing, the U.S has a history of using such events to go to war (sinking of USS main to go to war with Spain, sinking of a destroyer (or cruiser, can't remember exactly) to go to war with the North Vietnamese, I'm sure there's more) Another reason (as Gerdy provided) is that the towers did not fall naturally. Instead of the top of the tower falling to the side that the impact came from (similar as how a tree falls towards where it was chopped) it collapsed inwards, which is more similar to a controlled demolition. After the buildings had collapsed, and the fire was put out, the government DID NOT allow anyone to do tests on the destroyed buildings, and quickly took away the destroyed materials. This is also suspicious behavior. All in all, I think it was likely an inside job. Another idiotic explanation Please then, go through and debunk my claims. I would be quite happy if you do, considering no citizen wants to think of their country as against them. |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 17, 2021 6:14:25 GMT
Post by rommel323 on Jun 17, 2021 6:14:25 GMT
I belive that there is a good chance 9/11 was an inside job. For one thing, the U.S has a history of using such events to go to war (sinking of USS main to go to war with Spain, sinking of a destroyer (or cruiser, can't remember exactly) to go to war with the North Vietnamese, I'm sure there's more) Another reason (as Gerdy provided) is that the towers did not fall naturally. Instead of the top of the tower falling to the side that the impact came from (similar as how a tree falls towards where it was chopped) it collapsed inwards, which is more similar to a controlled demolition. After the buildings had collapsed, and the fire was put out, the government DID NOT allow anyone to do tests on the destroyed buildings, and quickly took away the destroyed materials. This is also suspicious behavior. All in all, I think it was likely an inside job. But why would America want to invade Afghanistan? As it's aftermath was a war with Islamist groups. |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 17, 2021 8:20:54 GMT
via mobile
Post by Adozf Hitzer on Jun 17, 2021 8:20:54 GMT
Another idiotic explanation Please then, go through and debunk my claims. I would be quite happy if you do, considering no citizen wants to think of their country as against them. Because you are a Democrat who hates Bush deeply from heart. |
|
|
|
9/11
Jun 17, 2021 13:17:48 GMT
Post by warlord247 on Jun 17, 2021 13:17:48 GMT
Please then, go through and debunk my claims. I would be quite happy if you do, considering no citizen wants to think of their country as against them. Because you are a Democrat who hates Bush deeply from heart. Actually I'm a republican, try again. And as I said, that's not substantial. Please, use actual proof and facts. |
|
